The United Nations recently voted overwhelmingly -- over the predictably pathetic objection of the United States -- to endorse the wider use of equal-area maps for most purposes. This is a subject that was cogently addressed in a fictional (and better) West Wing back in November, 2000.
Comparisons such as this one from The True Size help to illustrate the point that the UN was making: the 1569 Mercator projection was absolutely the correct choice for navigation but it is not good for representation. One could say that is was an essential tool of colonialism that has had the (mostly) unintended side effect of supporting post-colonial thinking.
The disparity in the relative size of Argentina and Greenland is probably the example geographers cite the most. Until the obsession of the current president of the United States with the Danish colony, this has not been a very consequential example. More important and pervasive has been the tendency of the Mercator projection to minimize the size of Africa in the mental maps of many of us.
I used the online tool The True Size to make the corrective example above, and I recommend the site to anybody seeking to compare the size of regions. I often use it when I want to help students (or myself) think about unfamiliar places in terms of more familiar places.
This is all by way of prelude to a number of maps of the African contient itself that I have found recently.. The map of national boundaries is both unfamiliar to many non-African viewers and also itself an inadequate representation of the continent. That is to say, the boundaries are merely a starting point, given that they obscure many important geographic patterns. In fact, many of the dire challenges facing the continent have to do with the imposition of these boundaries.
Perhaps the best example of this is a map depicting 2010 (pre-South Sudan) boundaries superimposed on a map of language families. I discuss this -- and a North America comparison -- in my 2012 post Immigrants Should Learn the Language.
All of this is by way of prelude to sharing a few maps that have come across the (digital) transom in the past couple of weeks. Each of which is an opportunity to look at Africa in terms other than (or in addition to) the colonial.
The first is a more detailed approximation of the language geography hinted at above, in a map that identifies a few dozen languages in a half-dozen language families. No one map can capture all of the continent's linguistic diversity, but the Wikimedia Languages of Africa provides a bit more insight, as do the accompanying Wikipedia Languages of Africa article and its various citations.
All maps are selective -- this one takes the unusual step of including a notation to that effect -- at least five times as many languages could be shown. The shortfall is much greater in some areas, particularly Nigeria with its 500 languages. I noticed one of the citations in this article with interest, but will spare readers a long journey down that particular rabbit hole and will just say that the Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL) is both a highly respected academic organization and a close partner of the Wycliffe Bible Translators. I have been to one of their jointly operated base camps in the Braziian Amazon; they share headquarters in Texas.
Whenever I think of the linguistic diversity of the continent, I am reminded of one of my favorite musicians: Angélique Kidjo of Benin (not far from Nigeria). She is fluent in two colonial languages and three regional languages: Fon, French, Yorùbá, Gen (Mina) and English. And in the one listed last in her biography, she is more fluent than most English speakers I have known.
Another linguistic map that caught my attention recently describes the extent to which Amazigh languages are spoken across the nothern part of the continent, and the variety of languages in that family, which are perhaps better known as Berber languages.
| Apologies: the only citation I have for this map is a general reference to the Facebook page GeoPolice. |
Another map that caught my attention is a bit of cartographic humor that shows just how arbitrary colonial land-taking could be. Nobody in these three countries wanted the absurd eastward extension of Namibia, but residents of all three countries must contend with it more than a century after the fact. The Geo All Day page includes a brief explanation of the 1890 Caprivi Strip.
The Fabric Map of Africa points to another important facet of cultural identity -- of which language, food, and religion are more commonly-noticed examples. It puts me in mind of impressive exhibits of art from the continent that I was lucky enough to see in Annapois and Baltimore in 2019. As with the lingusitc maps above, these fabrics represent much greater textile variety present in real life.
The other really cool map that came to my attention recently is about biogeography, though human movement seems also to be part of this story.
The range of the super-cute African crested porcupine (Hystrix cristata) is quite unusually disjointed, comprising three or four isolated regions at great distances from each other. The distance is what suggests the involvement of human trade or migration in getting the critters so far apart.
Knowing something of the geography of the continent's climates and biomes makes the adaptability of this plucky mammal even more remarkable. It is found in areas suitable for grapes and olives in the north, lowland rain forests in the west, and coffee-growing cloud forests in the east.
Lagniappe: A Speech
A very timely surprise came as I spent a few days writing this post. Cabo Verde Prime Minister Francisco Carvalho's turn to speak at the UN General Assembly came on Saturday morning, September 26. He took the opportunity to speak in Kriolu (Cape Verdean Creole) -- and the UN video player allows viewers to choose "original" as one of its eight audio tracks. This came a few weeks after the International Day of the Mother Tongue, and was apparently the first time that a Cape Verdean leader used the Cape Verdean language rather than Portuguese in this setting. Side note: the first two heads of state to speak were the president of Brazil and the president of the United States, which is the usual order. This is because at the first UN General Assembly, nobody wanted to go first, and the then-president of Brazil finally offered to do so. Brazil has been first ever since, followed by the United States as host. I have no idea how the rest of the order is set.
The content of PM Carvalho's address is, of course, as important as the language he used. He joined many (maybe all?) African leaders in using this opportunity to call for passage of a resolution that would give the continent -- and its 1.6 billion people -- a permanent seat on the UN Security Council. The fifteen seats on the Council rotate in such a way that Africa is always represented. But importantly, it is only the five "permanent" members who have veto authority, That short list is decades overdue for a reshuffle.











