I remain a teacher because it helps me to keep learning. Students -- current and former -- are a big part of that, and a long-ago geography student brought this latest geographic lesson my way. She has long been very knowledgeable about plants, and with her son now living in Wisconsin, she has been learning about the biogeography a thousand miles west of our local lands. She recently shared this image from Wisconsin Field Guide by way of the group Native Plants of Wisconsin. She rightly guessed that I would be interested -- I love this kind of geographic thinking and I love Wisconsin!
The sources that recently posted this map on Facebook credit not only the Schlitz Audubon Nature Center for the image itself but also University of Wisconsin-Madison professor John Curtis, who identified and named the Tension Zone in the 1950s.
He had identified a number of significant differences in biogeography and other landscape characteristics the areas north and south of this diagonal line. The Field Guide post describes a number of gradients in temperature, growing season, and soil that coincide along this zone, which comrpises the northernmost range of 180 plant species and the southernmost range of 120 others.
The post goes on to describe many examples of changes that those driving might "feel" routinely without being conscious of it. My personal favorite is this one:
That is also roughly where people stop saying they are going to the cottage and start saying they are going up north.
I love this because it reminds me of something I hear a lot from our Wisconsin cousins -- summer vacations are not at a camp, cabin, or house They are at "the cottage" and everyone knows what this means.
We visited those cousins this past summer and although we were to early for the cottage, we did enjoy our stay on the northeastern corner of the Tension Zone -- in Appleton, just west of the tippy-tip of Green Bay. We did enjoy a day-long side quest deep into the "South region" and more specifically the part known as the Driftless Area. Research on the soils and forests there was essential literature in my own studies just north of Cincinnati.
This is where my own bit of geographic nerdiness comes into play. I went to graduate school in Ohio, another state whose landscape has been shaped by glaciation. I use the word "nerdiness" to reflect the fact that I kept a map of Ohio's glacial features handy the entire time, and was overjoyed to explore the geomorphology of the southernmost extent of Wisconsinian glaciation -- well to the south and east of Wisconsin itself.
The southernmost extent of some species coincides -- as Professor Curtis observed -- with the southernmost extent of Wisconsin glaciation. That term refers to the fourth and final (so far) advance of the continental ice sheets that advanced and retreated throughout the Pleistocene epoch -- that is, between 2,580,000 and 11.700 years ago.
The Driftless Area is essentially a subset of the South Region identified by Curtis. This area was never covered by continental glaciers. Southeastern Wisconsin -- and areas to the south in several neighboring states -- were glaciated. But those were during earlier stages -- Nebraskan, Kansan, and/or Illinoian. That is do say, the Tension Zone itself varies a bit east-to-west. In the west, it defines a region that was never glaciated; in the east, a region that was not recently glaciated. Therefore the topographic differences are not as pronounced as the biological ones in the eastern part of the state.
Fortunately, regional and Federal organizations have been working together to protect some of the fascinating remnants of Wisconsin's glacial past, most notably along the Ice Age National Scenic Trail. The development of that trail is a very complex and long-term project that is a case study in my Land Protection course.
All of this brings to mind another important line across North American landscapes: the 100th meridian. I would argue that this line is not only longer than the Wisconsin Tension Zone, but also that it defines even more fundamental transitions, while being just as obscure to most observers.
Both of these lines exemplify some deeper and persistent discussions we have as geographers. To what extent do the patterns of physical geography influence or define human geography? In the early 20th century, geographers got rather carried away with patterns of influence, trying to show that human geography -- such as language patterns -- was determined by physical geography. Most of the field has shied away from what is called Environmental Determinism. But yet, cottages do seem to have something to do with glaciers!






